Annual Report 1993-1994
1.1 The Economy has consolidated itself in the initial years of Eighth Five Year Plan. Fiscal crisis having been managed, the focus of attention now returns to development. The years of crisis also brought in the realisation that planning needs a reorientation. The Eighth Plan places special emphasis on private entreprener-ship, people's initiative and participatory development. In 1993-94, the second year of Eighth Plan, the long term developmental issues that need to be addressed through the process of investment planning and public policy have got even more sharply demarcated from those which should be pursued through market processes in the economy.
1.2 The rate and pattern of growth during the recent years has been influenced by the measures taken to recoup the fiscal situation faced during 1990-92. As per the quick estimate, the growth in GDP in 1992-93 is 4.0%, which is a significant improvement over 1.1% growth during the preceding year. Advance estimate for 1993-94 is 3.8% growth in GDP.
1.3 Agricultural production had shown 4% improvement during 1992-93. Foodgrain production in 1992-93 was 180 million tonnes, an increase of 7% over 1991-92. The overall rainfall index weighted by Kharif cereal production as on 30.9.93 was 94.8% compared to 88.8% recorded during the same period last year. The temporal distribution of rainfall during the current year was somewhat less favourable to Kharif crops compared to 1992-93 season, although the total rainfall received in 1993 was quantitatively more as compared to 1992. Impact of the total rainfall received during North-west monsoon thus indicates that the level of foodgrains production achieved in 1992-93 is likely to be maintained in 1993-94.
1.4 The index of industrial production in 1992-94 indicates a slow recovery from the decline of 0.1% during 1991-92. The index of industrial production for the period April-October 1993-94 showed a modest growth of 1.6 per cent over the level in the same period last year.
1.5 The basic infrastructure is required to grow at a higher rate to help the economy attain a growth rate of over five per cent in national output and 20 per cent in exports. During 1992- 93 sectoral growth rates of infrastructure were relatively lower than the warranted levels. While production of coaland electricity generation registered lower growth, that of crude oil declined significantly during 1992-93.
1.6 Performance of infrastructure sector during April- December 1993 has been mixed. While power generation has risen by 7.4 per cent and coal production by 4.7 per cent over the corresponding period last year, crude oil production is still on the decline and the growth in railways' revenueearning traffic has been marginal.
1.7 The process of economic restructuring has influenced the pattern of industrial growth. Industries which have a high domestic value addition, or have a significant exports linkage have performed better. Many such industries are in small scale sector-where output may not be readily reflected in the index of industrial production.
1.8 Measured in terms of annual average of weekly wholesale price index, the rate of inflation during 1991-94 is around 10%. The annual inflation rate during the months April to November 1993 has been in the range of 7 to 8.8%. Annual price rise during April-Dec.93 however is 7.8% which is well below the 13.9 per cent rise for this part of the year in 1991, and 11 per cent in 1992. A feature of the recent price situation is the containment of high rise in the price of food articles; the increase in food prices which was 20% in 1991-92 and 12% in 1992-93 and reduced to 5 per cent during the first 9 months of 1993-94, on average of weeks basis. Supply potential of basic commodities created in the country through investment in earlier plans has also helped in managing the price rise, and maintaining the supply of essential commodites in this phase of adjustment.
1.9 A sharp reduction in current account deficit (CAD) to a level of 1 per centofGDP was made in 1991-92, and it was higher at 2.2 per cent in 1992-93 due to relaxation on import curbs, Exports have started recovering in 1993-94 after the exchange rate adjustments. Trade deficit having fallen in absolute terms, it is quite likely that CAD in 1993-94, will be less than 2 per cent of GDP.
1.10 Thus, on an overall stocktaking of recent economic developments the growth in GDP has improved significantly in relation to 1991-92 though it is still below what the Eighth Plan targets at. The savings position of Government has improved though much remains to be done. The price situation is under control. The recovery in exports has enabled containment of the current account deficit in line with the target of reducing it to 1.6% in the five year period. Lowering of current account deficit and a recovery of confidence in Indian economy of me foreign investors in financing of CAD have contributed to a build-up in foreign exchange reserves. This affords a wider set of options in planning of investments than what could be foreseen two years ago at the stage of preparation of the Eighth Plan.
1.11 The primary focus of Eighth Five Year Plan, keeping in view the perspective of development, is human development. This requires investments for human development and raising the income levels through full employment. The backlog of human development is large and thus, besides making investments in this sector, measures to utilise the plan resources in a better way are essential. With this objective the National Development Council (NDC) had set up sub-committees to go into details of issues arising in the prioirity areas of population control, employment generation, literacy, decentralised planning and austerity and report back to the Council. Accordingly the sub-committee constituted for each of the above priority areas, examined the issues in detail and submitted their reports to the NDC.
1.12 The Forty Fifth meeting of the National Development Council (NDC) held on April 5, 1993 considered the report of the NDC Committee on Austerity. The Forty Sixth meeting of the Council held on September 18, 1993 considered the reports of the NDC Committees on Population, Literacy, Employment and Micro- Level Planning and Involvement of People at the Grass Root Level.
1.13 The NDC generally endorsed the report of the Committee on Austerity. The Council directed that the Planning Commission should have wider consultations on the Committee's recommendations. Accordingly, the Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission held discussions with the representatives of the major political parties and trade unions including the National Council (Staff Side), Joint Consultative Machinery (JCM) Central Government Employees. The participants, while stressing the need for curtailing the non-Plan expenditure wanted the Centre and State Governments to make concerted efforts towards this direction. An Action Taken Report on the wider consultations by the Planning Commission was submitted to the 46th meeting of the NDC held on 18th September, 1993. The Council took note of the action taken in this regard. The NDC endorsed the recommendations made by the NDC sub-committees on:
The Council directed the nodal Ministires viz., Human Resource Development for Literacy and Education for All, Health and Family Welfare for Population, and Planning Commission for Micro-level Planning and Employment generation to initiate further action.
1.14 It was resolved that a meeting of the Chief Ministers and opinion makers for wider consultations on the future course of action needed for the implementation of the report on population, would be convened.
1.15 On the report of the Committee on Literacy and the document "Education for All", as resolved by the Council, a meeting of the Chief Ministers for discussion and working out an action plan for effective implementation was convened.
1.16 On the reports of the Committees on Employment and Micro Level Planning, the Planning Commission was directed to initiate further action for discussion with the concerned Ministries and the State Governments. Planning Commission is to coordinate and monitor the implementation of these Committees' recommendations. The implementing agencies are the various Central Ministries and the State Governments.
1.17 Higher priority has been given to human development and social sectors in the budgetary support to the plan. The share of Health and Family Welfare, Women and Child Development, Welfare of Backward Classes, Nutrition, Education and Rural Development in the total budgetary support in the Central Plan has shifted from 26% in the Seventh Plan to about 38% in the Annual Plan 1992-93 (RE) and further to 43% in the Annual Plan 1993-94 (BE). States and Union Territories have been allocating and increasing share to "Social Services" in the recent years, and have provided 24.7% of the plan outlay for the education, health, family welfare, welfare of weaker sections and other social service programmes during the two Annual Plans 1992-94. This is higher than the 23.9% share targetted for this sector in the Eighth Plan of States and UTs.
1.18 In the process of economic restructuring, considerable reliance has been placed on private sector particularly in power, oil, transport and telecommunication. Innovative measures are being pursued by the concerned Ministries and State governments to motivate the private corporate sector to invest in these areas. In fulfiling the objective of providing larger area in the economy for the private sector, practically no new large green field project in manufacturing has been taken in the public sector in the first two years. The private sector has started responding to new areas of demand, including the infrastructure. In 1993-94 100 MW power generation capacity will come up in the private sector out of 4439 MW of total capacity to be commissioned in that year. A number of private sector projects are expected to be initiated in the near future, though more intensive follow up is necessary to realise the targeted contribution of 2800 MW from private sector in the Eighth Plan period.
1.19 Investment in the infrastructure sectors, it must he recognised, is going to be among the most crucial factors determining the performance of the economy in the medium and long term. Trends observed in the recent past indicate that unless investments in some key segments of infrastructure, particularly energy and transport are rteised serious bottlenecks may soon develop in the growth of the economy. While public sector outlays in the Central Plan during the first three years of the Eighth Plan have been more or less in line with the total investment envisaged during the Plan period, there have been serious shortfalls in the Plan outlays in the States in the infrastructure sectors. In the Central Plan, outlay in the energy and transport sectors during the first three years of the Plan has been to the tune of 73 per cent of the total Eighth Plan outlay; the corresponding ratio for the first two years has been only 29 per cent for the State sector. The Eighth Plan envisages an increasing role for the private sector in infrastructure but the experience so far has not been commensurate with the expectations. The private sector investment is unlikely to grow fast enough during the next 2-3 years to make good the shortfalls in public sector investments particularly because the segments of infrastructure in which such shortfalls exist, namely, hydro electric power generation, atomic energy, development of railways in backward regions and road transpormi are as of now not sufficiently attractive for private sector to invest or raising funds through market borrowings. It is, therefore, essential to have a substantial step-up in public sector investment in these areas. It is necessary to attract larger private investment alongwith the public sector investment since public investment normally acts as a complement to private investment and not as a substitute.
1.20 For the economy to realise the maximum benefits from the public investment in infrastructure, it is necessary that me public sector enterprise operations are run on efficent lines. India already has a large public sector with many of the enterprises operating in the basic industries and key infrastructural areas. Their efficient operation is vital for the growth of the economy. The performance of most of these enterprises, however, has so far been generally disappointing. The return on capital employed has been low (barely 2%), their record on prices, productivity and manpower costs has been unsatisfactory and constant criticism has been voiced about the lower level of customer services which they provided. The major reason for these deficiencies is the system or the structural framework within which the enterprises operate.
The public sector enterprises are continually open to political and bureaucratic interference - both formal and informal; and conflicting social and commercial objectives are placed on them to the detriment of both. Their finances had been virtually underwritten by the Government through the provision of easy and cheap money through open-ended budgetary support, frequent capital restructuring and financing of the time and cost overruns of their capital investment projects. These have been hardly conductive to effe-cient behaviour. Simultaneously, a complex framework of controls has been built up which puts constraint on their operational autonomy and flexibility in management practices.
1.21 There is an urgent necessity to bring about comprehensive public sector reforms which must address these concerns and aim at changing the system or the structural framework within which the enterprises operate. The focus of these reforms has to be on improving the performance of the enterprises through increased efficiency, greater responsiveness to the consumers and relief from the governmental, financial and administrative constraints. Strengthening the market forces and competition within the economy has also to be emphasised. All these would necessitate measures for distancing the government and its agencies from the commercial public sector enterprises which will ensure greater operational autonomy, flexibility in management practices as well as accountability and responsibility of the management for profit maximisation and minimisation of cost.
1.22 Operational autonomy in the public enterprises can be brought out in a number of ways. There has to be a delicate balance between autonomy and accountability. Government control can be limited to the areas of debt, major new investments and operational results, whereas intervention in procurement contracts, employment levels, and operating decisions needs to be avoided. In the case of the enterprises which raise their own resources for financial investment and for running their operations there has to be minimal control by the Government.
1.23 The public sector enterprises which are non-strategic in nature and are viable and profitable can be given much more freedom through the dilution of Government equity. The disinvestment policy should be made flexible so as to promote wide public ownership of the shareholding of these enterprises which will enble them to function as board-managed professional companies independent of government administrative and financial control. This will promote increased private sector participation in management. Public sector reform should also address the issue of industrial sickness. In respect of the enterprises which can be turned around with reorganisation appropriate restructuring proposals should be prepared and implemented keeping in view the specific requirements of each individual enterprise. The enterprises which are non-strategic and terminally non-viable should be closed quickly so as to save the industry from their damaging influence.
1.24 Therefore, the point that needs to be highlighted in this context is that economic planning per se continues to be an important factor determining the strategies for public investment, besides providing guidelines for channelisingprivate sector investment in desired directions. These have to act as mutually complementary forces in ensuring rapid economic development of the nation. There are certain key areas including Energy, Human Resource Development, Backward Areas Development, manage-mentof Balance of Payments etc. where a holistic approach to policy formulation is essential. Public investment has provided a minimum threshold level of investment in spheres like Telecommunications, Transport, Energy, which has enabled the private sector to further diversify in these sectors, including development of a large number of ancillary industries centring around major public sector units. Thus, concluding, we can state that central planning and investment has provided the base over which the superstructure of further development can occur smoothly with planning playing an integrative role.
PLAN PROGRESS
THE EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN 1992-97
2.1 The Eighth Five Year Plan was launched on 1st April, 1992, against the back drop of a series of measures to correct phyis-cal/structural imbalances prevailing in the economy. The Eighth Five Year Plan document was endorsed by the National Development Council in its 44th meeting held in May, 1992. The Council approved a public sector plan size of Rs. 4,34,100 crores. Total Investment of Rs.798,000 crores at 1991-92 prices was projected for the Five year period 1992- 97. Out of this public sector investment was to be of Rs. 361,000 crores (45%). Adding to this, the current outlay of Rs.73,000 crores, the public sector outlay would be Rs.434,000 crores. This outlay was to be divided between the Central and the States in the ratio of 58.5 : 41.5. Keeping in view the basic objectives and thrust of Eighth Plan and the envisaged macro dimensions, the sectoral allocations were worked out.
2.2 The salient features of the Eighth Plan are :
a) the Plan is indicative in nature. It concentrates on building a long term strategic vision of future and sets forth priorities of the nation. For the Public Sector, a detailed project-wise and sector-wise plan has been prepared. But for the rest of the economy, it tends to provide the incentives and directions necessary to grow in a desired manner.
b) The Plan recognises "human development" as the core of all development efforts. Accordingly, adequate emphasis has been given in the Plan to the priority sectors that contribute towards the realisation of this goal viz. health, literacy and basic needs including drinking water, housing and welfare programmes for the weaker sections. Besides, the infrastructural sectors like power, transport and communications have also been assigned top priority.
c) The non-inflationary manner of funding has been adopted to avoid the debt trap both internally and externally. This calls for reduction in non plan expenditure, higher resource mobilisation both by the Centre and the States and improvement in the performance of public sector units.
d) The Plan makes efforts to integrate the developmental activities under one umbrella so as to ensure effective implementation of all the programmes. It also puts emphasis on the need to involve people in the process of development. This implies, substantially, devolution of power to the peoples' organisations at the district/block level. It is in this context that the 72nd Constitution Amendment Bill for strengthening of Panchayats was passed by the Parliament in December, 1992. The Panchayats will now have the responsibility of preparing plans for the economic development of the area under their jurisdiction, as well as for implementing them.
e) The Eighth Plan pays special attention to the employment in the rural areas. The need for expansion of employment opportunities in rural areas in order to check migration to urban areas calls for a shift in the emphasis in the rural development programmes from the creation of relief type of employment to building up of durable assets in the rural areas. These assets are expected to enhance productivity and create more job opportunities, leading to sustained development.
f) The Plan is performance oriented. It concentrates not some much on its allocative role, but on how to utilise the allocations optimally. The stress is on performance improvement, quality consciousness, competitiveness, efficiency of operations and on timely completion of the projects.
g) The Eighth Plan is a flexible one, with scope for change, innovation and adjustment. Alongwith putting stress on the need for making available increased resources in both Central and State sectors, the Plan also envisages private sector investment in quite a few some areas like power, transport and communications in order to bridge the resource gap.
ANNUAL PLANS:
2.3 The Five Year Plan get operational ised through the mechanism of Annual Plans. The formulation of the Annual Plan provides the Planning Commission with an opportunity to assess previous year's plan performance in the various sectors and to suggest a re-orientation of policies and modifications of strategies consistent with the changing requirements so as to ensure achievement of the long term objectives.
2.4 In the third quarter of each financial year, the Planning Commission indicates to the State Governments and the Central Ministries the important objectives that should be kept in view while formulating the Annual Plan for the following year and to furnish their Plan proposals including physical targets and the corresponding financial outlays required, conforming to the guidelines referred to above and within the overall framework of their respective Five Year Plans. The State Governments are advised to furnish their forecasts of financial resources including proposals for mobilising additional resources for their Annual Plans, keeping in view the resources and outlay, targets fixed for the Five Year Plan etc. Accordingly, the States and Central Ministries furnish their plan proposals. The Annual Plan proposals and resource estimates of the State Governments are discussed in depth in a series of meetings during November-December with senior officers of the State Governments. Similarly , indepth discussions are held with senior officials of the Central Ministries/Departments regarding their Annual Plan proposals, during October- December of each year.
2.5 The Plan outlays arrived at in the meetings between the Deputy Chairman and the State Chief Ministers/Lt. Governors in respect of State Plans and at meetings taken by Member-Secretary Planning Commission with the Secretaries of Central Ministries/Departments, regarding'the Central Plan form the basis for budgetary provisions of the Plan for the coming year.
REVIEW OF ANNUAL PLAN 1992-93:
2.6 The Annual Plan 1992-93 provides for a public sector outlay of Rs. 80,772 crores at the current prices. At 1991-92 prices, it would have been about 17% of the envisaged Eighth Plan public sector outlay. However, there was a shortfall of 5% in the first year's outlay according to the revised estimates. The shortfall was mainly in the State Plans. Against the approved State Plan outlay of Rs.31,074 crores (i.e. 38.5% of the public sector outlay), the revised estimates for 1992-93 is Rs.26,128 crores (i.e. 33.9% of the public sector outlay). The Central and Union Territories' plan outlay of Rs.49,698 crores has now been estimated to be exceeded by 3%.
ANNUAL PLAN 1993-94
2.7 The Annual Plan 1993-94 provides for a public sector outlay of Rs. 100,120 crores at current prices, allowing for assumed price rise of 10% in 1992-93 and 7% in 1993-94. This will be 19.6% of the Eighth Five Year Plan outlay in real terms. State Plan outlay for 1993-94 is Rs.34,695 crores i.e. 34.6% of the public sector outlay and yet contingent upon an 80% increase in State's own resource mobilisation efforts. Taking the revised estimate of the first year and a budgeted estimate of the second year, the first two year's expenditure under the State Plans in real terms will be only 30% of the projected Five Year plan outlay. Central assistance for the State Plans in the first two years has been 36% of the Five Year Plan provisions. The States own resource effort in these two years have been only 24% of the level projected for the Five Year Plan. This shortfall requires to be made up by mobilising higher resources and reducing the non plan expenditure in order to maintain the Plan size. The Central Sector Plan outlay of Rs.63,936.16 crores for 1993-94 is financed through Rs.23,241 crores of budgetary support, Rs.19,062 crores of internal resources and Rs. 21,633 crores from extra budgetary resources of the Central Public Sector Undertakings. During the first two years, the Central Plan is estimated to have mobilised in real terms, 46.8% of the extra budgetary resource envisaged for the entire Annual Plan period.
ANNUAL PLAN 1994-95
2.8 So far as State Plans are concerned, the Plan size of each State/UT, was decided in a series of discussion between the Deputy Chairman and the Governors/Chief Ministers/Lt. Governors ofStates/UTs. The detailed sectoral allocations were worked out thereafter by the various sectoral working groups. The normal Central assistance to non-special category States giving weightage of 7.5% to performance criteria as per the Mukherjee formula of distribution of Central assistance to States has been made. The performance criteria is as follows:-
2.9 The Commission is seeking to encourage better implementation of externally aided projects and consequently is keen to pick up all such funds for utilization in timely completing such projects. The indicator for performance, qua population control is the differential between the desired performance and the actual performance in relation to birth rate and infant mortality rate. In respect of elimination of illiteracy the criterion will be performance in relation to female literacy.
2.10 The process of formulation of Annual Plan 1994-95 for the Central Sector was initiated by the Member-Secretary, Planning Commission in October, 1993 by taking a series of meetings in with the Secretaries and other officers of Central Ministries/ Departments participated. These were concluded in December, 1993.
2.11 An outlay of Rs. 112144.12 crores was approved for Annual Plan 1994-95, comprising Rs. 70140.96 crores for Centre, Rs. 40923.16 crores for States (including Rs. 2063.50 crores for Union Territories) and Rs. 1080 crores for Special Area Development Programme. The plan outlay for Centre has risen hy9.7 per cent over the figures of Rs. 63936 crores in 1993-94. The share of budgetary support in the Central Sector for the Annual Plan 1994-95 is 38.88 per cent compared to 36.35 per cent in the previous Annual Plan. The Central Sector Plan outlay of Rs.70140.96 crores for 1994-95 is financed through Rs.27277.55 crores of budgetary support, Rs.22930.78 crores of internal resources and Rs. 19932.63 crores from extra budgetary resources of the Central Public Sector Undertakings.
ANNEXURE-2.1 PLAN OUTLAY BY BROAD HEADS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR EIGHTH PLAN 1992-97 (Rs. crores)
| CENTRE | STATES/UTs | TOTAL | ||
| 1 . | Agriculture and Services O) | 36788.00 | 56268.00 | 93056.00 |
| 2. | Energy | 66795.00 | 48685.00 | 115480.00 |
| 3. | Industry t. Minerals | 37539.00 | 9382.00 | 46921.00 |
| 4. | T ransport | -'.0977.00 | 14948.00 | 55925.00 |
| 5. | Socfa-l Services and Others (*) | 65766.00 | 50202.00 | 115968.00 |
| 0. | Special Area Programmes | 6750.00 | 6750.00 | |
| TOTAL: | 247865.00 | 186235.00 | 434100.00 |
0) Include Agricultural
and Allied Services, Rural DcvoIopment, Irrigation and Flood Control.
(*) Others
include Coniinuni cat i ons, Science Technology and Environment, General
Economic Services and Gcneriil Services.
ANNEXURE-2.2 PLAN OUTLAY BY BROAD HEADS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR ANNUAL PLAN 1993-94 (Rs. crores)
| CENTRE | STATES/UTs | TOTAL | ||
| 1 . | Agriculture and Services (B) | 6939.54 | 10510.54 | 17450.08 |
| 2. | Energy | 21911.27 | 9008.97 | 30920.24 |
| 3. | Industry and Minerals | 9633.72 | 1728.90 | 11362.62 |
| 4. | Transport | 10893.21 | 3054.27 | 13947.48 |
| 5. | Social Services and Others(*) | 14558.42 | 10475.71 | 25034.13 |
| 6. | Area Development Programme | 1405.61 | 1405.61 | |
| TOTAL | 63936.16 | 36184.00(**) | 100120.16 |
(@) Include Agricultural
and Allied Services, Rural Development, Irrigation and Flood Control.
(*) Others
include Coininunications, Science Technology and Environment, General
Economic Services and General Services.
(**') Exclude Rs. 100 crores later allocated to Punjab.
Annexure. 2.3 OUTLAY AND PROGRESS OF EXPENDITURE: CENTRE, STATE and U.T.s (Rs. in crores)
| Sl . No. | Centre/States/ Union Terri tones | Annual Plan 1991-92 ACTUALS | Eighth Plan 1992-97 PLAN OUTLAY | Annual Plan 1992-93 APPROVE' OUTLAY | Annual Plan 1992-93 R.E. | Annual Plan 1993-94 B.E. |
| 1 . | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1 . | Centre | 37846.49 | 247865.00 | 48407.OS | 49719.07 | 63936.16 |
| 2. | States | 25739.35 | 179985.00 | 31073.88 | 26128.05 | 34694.50 |
| 3. | Uni on Territories | 1165.36 | 6250.00 | 1291.00 | 1280.28 | 1489.50 |
| TOTAL: | (s^t"3f .20 | 434100.00 | 80771.96 | 77127.40 | 100120.16 |
ANNEXURE
- 2.4 OUTLAY AND PROGRESS OF EXPENDITURE BY HEADS OF DEVELOPMENT: CENTRE, STATES and U.T.s
(Rs. in crores)
| Sl. No. | Heads of Development | Annual
Plan 1991-92 ACTUALS |
Eighth
Plan 1992-97 PLAN OUTLAY |
Annual
Plan 1992-93 (BE) APPROVE OUTLAY |
Annual
Plan 1992-93 R.E. |
Annual
Plan 1993-94 B.E. |
| 1 . | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| I . | Agriculture and AlIied Activities | 3850.53 | 22467.21 | 4710.28 | 4372.75 | 5408.93 |
| U . | Rural Development | 4141.64 | 34425.36 | 4536.20 | 5009.97 | 6187.6? |
| III. | Special Area Programmes | 1067.28 | 6750.16 | 1179.83 | 1153.91 | 1405.61 |
| IV. | Irrigation and Flood Control | 4231.87 | 32525.29 | 4934.55 | 4419.09 | 5853.53 |
| V. | Energy | 19733.63 | 115561.09 | 23574.23 | 23411.54 | 30920.24 |
| 1. Power | 14517.89 | 79588.74 | 14943.93 | 12781.02 | 16419.91 | |
| 2. Petroleum | 3339.83 | 24000.00 | 6054.00 | 8159.06 | 11523.81 | |
| 3. Others | 1875.90 | 11972.35 | 2576.30 | 2471.46 | 2976.52 | |
| VI. | Industry and Mi neraIs | 6564.45 | 46921.75 | 9883.50 | 9270.55 | 11362.62 |
| 1 . | ViIlage S, Smal I Indust n es | 941.24 | 6334.20 | 1157.25 | 1022.55 | 1289.72 |
| 2. | Iron and Steel Industri es | 2720.66 | 14579.00 | 3072.00 | 3109.71 | 3166.06 |
| 3. | FertiIi zer Indust r i es | 218.03 | 5484.00 | 1234.00 | 509.12 | 935.00 |
| 4. | Petro Chemi cal | 345.73 | 4582.20 | 764.^n | 874.68 | 1625.39 |
| 5. | 1ndustr i es Atomic Energy Industr i es | 168.87 | 1200.00 | 192.00 | 202.2? | 231.67 |
| 6. | Others | 2169.92 | 14742.35 | 3463.75 | 3552.27 | 4114.78 |
| VII | Transport | 9313.99 | 55925.57 | 11756.47 | 10515.40 | 13947.48 |
|
|
1. RaiIways | 5393.27 | 27202.00 | 5700.00 | 5710.00 | 6900.00 |
|
|
2. Others | 3920.72 | 28723.57 | 6056.47 | 4805.40 | 7047.48 |
| VI I I | Communications | 3613.68 | 25109.98 | 4890.00 | 4968.32 | 6247.75 |
| IX | Science, Technology and Environment | 861.72 | 9041.69 | 991.88 | 956.33 | 1316.64 |
| X | GeneraI Economic Services | 842.99 | 4549.52' | 1105.25 | 827.88 | 1501.22 |
| XI . | Social Services | 10298.72 | 79011.90 | 12847.01 | 11937.94 | 15430.23 |
| 1. Education | 2598.98 | 19599.73 | 2945.43 | 2993.33 | 3983.59 | |
| 2. Medical and Public Health | 924.82 | 7575.92 | 1307.31 | 1276.29 | 1622.18 | |
| 3. Family Uelfare | 1023.28 | 6500.00 | 1000.00 | 1041.02 | 1270.00 | |
| 4. Water Supply and Sanitation. | 2246.07 | 16711.03 | 2365.64 | 2194.53 | 2944.96 | |
| 5. Housing and Urbar Development. | 1352.30 | 10550.00 | 2011.92 | 1843.17 | 2293.51 | |
| 6. Others. | 2153.27 | 18075.22 | 3212.71 | 2589.60 | 3316.10 | |
| XII. | General Services | 230.70 | 1810.48 | 362.77 | 283.72 | 538.19 |
| Total (1 to XII) | 64751 .20 | 434100.00 | 80771.96(*) | 77127.40 | 100120.16 |
(*) This figure was later revised to Rs. 80421.96 crores due to reduction in the Plan size of the State of Punjab by Rs. 350.00 crores.
Annexure - 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES S UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs )
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | TOTAL OUTLAY | PLAN OUTLAYS UNDER
MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME |
|||
| RURAL FUELUOOD. |
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION | RURAL ROADS | PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | |||
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. |
| 1. | Andhra Pradesh | 185100 | 125 | 0 | 3099 | 0 |
| 2. | Arunachal Pradesh | 29000 | 20 | 300 | 1385 | 0 |
| 3. | Assam | 102700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4. | Bihar | 230000 | 800 | 360 | 14079 | 324 |
| 5. | Goa | 17000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 6. | Gujarat | 213700 | 300 | 0 | 700 | 32 |
| 7. | Haryana | 92000 | 350 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 8. | Himachal Pradesh | 56000 | 0 | 0 | 1220 | 900 |
| 9. | Jainmil and Kashmi r | 88000 | 72 | 0 | 817 | 138 |
| 10. | Karnataka | 302500 | 1513 | 0 | 2500 | 0 |
| 11 . | Kerala | 100000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 12. | Madhya Pradesh | 240000 | 150 | 1500 | 3000 | 320 |
| 13. | Maharashtra | 380400 | 0 | 0 | 2291 | 0 |
| 14. | 23000 | 175 | 900 | 900 | 40 | |
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. |
STATE/UT | OUTLAYS
UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME |
|||||
EDUCATION |
RURAL HEALTH |
RURAL WATER SUPPLY |
RURAL SANITATION |
RURAL HOUSING |
|||
| ELEMENTARY | ADULT | ||||||
| 1 . | 2. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. |
| 1 . | Andhra Pradesh | 2670 | 524 | 800 | 4668 | 50 | 6587 |
| 2. | Arunachal Pradesh | 2845 | 75 | 309 | 960 | 80 | 120 |
| 3. | Assam | 11039 | 0 | 1620 | 3846 | 70 | 332 |
| 4. | Bihar | 9299 | 1000 | 6711 | 7548 | 300 | 556 |
| 5. | Goa | 186 | 50 | 232 | 375 | 100 | 23 |
| 6. | Gujarat | 2273 | 418 | 1650 | 5621 | 300 | .1800 |
| 7. | Haryana | 3060 | 160 | 925 | 2240 | 315 | 386 |
| 8. | Himachal Pradesh | 2403 | 60 | 975 | 853 | 500 | 50 |
| 9. | Jammu and Kashmir | 3215 | 10 | 1560 | 2382 | 866 | 16 |
| 10. | Karnataka | 14850 | 869 | 3517 | 6370 | 130 | 12555 |
| 11 . | Kerala | 0 | 0 | 506 | 482G | 225 | 225 |
| 12. | Madhya Pradesh | 10902 | 600 | 2808 | 3950 | 250 | 800 |
| 13. | Maharashtra | 4152 | 32 | 4741 | 9568 | 18 | 216 |
| 14. | Mani pur | 585 | 225 | 60 | 820 | 90 | 0 |
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | OUTLAYS UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME | %age of col.16 to col.3 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OF SLUMS | NUTRITION | TOTAL | |||
| 1 . | 2. | 14. | 15. | 16. | 17. |
| 1 . | Andhra Pradesh | 402 | 800 | 19725 | 10.66 |
| 2. | Arunachal Pradesh | 0 | 115 | 6209 | 21 .41 |
| 3. | Assam | 35 | 770 | 17712 | 17.25 |
| 4. | Bi har | 390 | 3028 | 44395 | 19.30 |
| 5. | Goa | 1 | 56 | 1035 | 6.09 |
| 6. | G u j a r a t | 300 | 10700 | 24094 | 11 .27 |
| 7. | Haryana | 190 | 582 | 8214 | 8.93 |
| 8. | Himachal Pradesh | 73 | 200 | 7234 | 12.92 |
| 9. | Jammu and Kashmir | 90 | 437 | 9603 | 10.91 |
| 10. | Karnataka | 912 | 1157 | 44373 | 14.67 |
| 11 . | KeraIa | 130 | 335 | 6251 | 6.25 |
| 12. | Madhya Pradesh | 510 | 2000 | 26790 | 11.16 |
| 13. | Maharashtra | 974 | 670 | 22662 | 5.96 |
| 14. | Mani pur | 30 | 185 | ||
Annexure - 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT
|
TOTAL OUTLAY | PLAN
OUTLAYS UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME |
|||
| RURAL FUELWOOD |
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION |
RURAL ROADS |
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM |
|||
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. |
| 15. | Meghalaya | 28100 | 100 | 500 | 785 | 31 |
| 16. | Mi zoram | 18500 | 150 | 720 | 800 | 42 |
| 17. | Nagaland | 20350 | 0 | 0 | 525 | 50 |
| 18. | Orissa | 145000 | 225 | 800 | 1350 | 24 |
| 19. | Punjab | 125000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20. | Rajasthan | 170000 | 200 | 2500 | 2200 | 123 |
| 21. | Sikkim | 12000 | 70 | 0 | 653 | 50 |
| 22. | TamiI Nadu | 210100 | 106 | 0 | 1000 | 79 |
| 23. | Tripura | 31000 | 40 | 750 | 775 | 17 |
| 24. | Uttar Pradesh | 405000 | 281 | 6454 | 12141 | 0 |
| 25. | West Bengat | 155000 | 150 | 1000 | 900 | 11 |
| Total (States) : | 3379450 | 4827 | 15784 | 51126 | ??03 | |
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | OUTLAYS UUDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME | |||||
EDUCATION |
RURAL HEALTH |
RURAL WATER SUPPLY |
RURAL SANlTATlON |
RURAL HOUSING |
|||
ELEMENTARY
ADULT |
|||||||
| 1 . | 2. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11 . | 12. | 13. |
| 15. | Meghalaya | 1950 | 100 | 483 | 1250 | 37 | 65 |
| 16. | Mi zoram | 300 | 25 | 200 | 300 | 10 | 15 |
| 17. | Nagaland | 300 | 0 | 100 | 400 | 0 | 0 |
| 18. | Orissa | 2668 | 630 | 1207 | 3185 | 220 | 300 |
| 19. | Punjab | 1192 | a | 1053 | 3469 | * | 0 |
| 20. | Rajasthan | 6850 | 300 | 2400 | 7122 | 40 | 350 |
| 21. | Sikkim | 660 | 12 | 245 | 325 | 10 | 25 |
| 22. | TamiI Nadu | 3824 | 738 | 2448 | 6000 | 50 | 480 |
| 23. | Tripura | 1550 | 80 | 450 | 800 | 20 | 135 |
| 24. | Uttar Pradesh | 15915 | 385 | 3924 | 6152 | 801 | 1550 |
| 25. | West Bengal | 3325 | 730 | 1292 | 1824 | 218 | 37 |
| Total (States) : | 106013 | 7023 | 40216 | 84848 | 4700 | 26623 | |
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | OUTLAYS UNDER MINIMUM
NEEDS PROGRAMME |
%age of col.16 to col.3 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OF SLUMS | NUTRITION | TOTAL | |||
| 1. | 2. | 14. | 15. | 16. | 17. |
| 15. | Meghalaya | 40 | 215 | 5556 | 19.77 |
| 16. | M i zoram | 10 | 115 | 2687 | 14.52 |
| 17. | Nagaland | 0 | 175 | 1550 | 7.62 |
| 18. | On ssa | 81 | 500 | 11190 | 7.72 |
| 19. | Punjab | 0 | 100 | 5814 | 4.65 |
| 20. | Rajasthan | 370 | 400 | 22855 | 13.44 |
| 21. | Sikkim | 5 | 120 | 2175 | 18.13 |
| 22. | TamiI Nadu | 230 | 7257 | 22212 | 10.57 |
| 23. | Tripura | 55 | 640 | 5312 | 17.14 |
| 24. | Uttar Pradesh | 785 | 2322 | 50710 | 12.52 |
| 25. | Uest Bengal | 700 | 1000 | 11187 | 7.22 |
| Total (States) : | 6313 | 33879 | 383555 | 11.35 | |
Annexure - 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | TOTAL OUTLAY | PLAN OUTLAYS UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME | |||
| RURAL FUELUOOD | RURAL ELECTRIFICATION | RURAL ROADS | PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | |||
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. |
| UNION TERRITORIES | ||||||
| 26. | A and N islands | 15650 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 78.67 |
| 27. | Chandigarh | 8000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 9.00 |
| 28. | Dadra and • Nagar Haveli | 2200 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 13.55 |
| 29. | Dairan and Oiu | 1600 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 30. | Delhi | 107500 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
| 31. | Lakshadweep | 3200 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 32. | Pondicherry | 10800 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 18.00 |
| Total (UTs.) : | 148950 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 169.22 | |
| Grand total (States and UTs) : | 3528400 | 4827.00 | 15784.00 | 51166.00 | 2372.22 | |
@ : Included under
Elementary Education.
* : Included
under Rural Uater Supply.
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. Lakhs)
| SL. NO. |
STATE/UT | OUTLAYS
UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME |
|||||
| EDUCATION | RURAL HEALTH |
RURAL
WATER SUPPLY |
RURAL SANITATION |
RURAL HOUSING |
|||
| ELEMENTARY | ADULT | ||||||
| 1 . | 2. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. |
| UNION TERRITORIES | |||||||
| 26. | A and N Islands | 487.75 | 6.15 | 240.00 | 350.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 27. | Chandigarh | 160.00 | 1.50 | 55.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 28. | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 120.00 | 9.50 | 24.75 | 61.00 | 5.00 | 16.00 |
| 29. | Daman and Diu | 100.74 | 5.50 | 38.00 | 45.50 | 5.00 | 3.81 |
| 30. | Delhi | 5794.00 | 90.00 | 0.00 | 400.00 | 25.00 | 0.00 |
| 31. | Lakshadweep | 36.10 | 3.00 | 35.55 | 70.00 | 16.00 | 0.00 |
| 32. | Pondicherry | 394.00 | 1 .00 | 207.00 | 59.00 | 10.00 | 130.00 |
| Total (UTs.) : | 7092.59 | 116.65 | 600.30 | 985.50 | 111.00 | 149.81 | |
| Grand total (States and UTs) : | 113105.59 | 7139.65 | 40816.30 | 85833.50 | 4811.00 | 26772.81 | |
3 : Included under
Elementary Education.
* : Included
under Rural Mater Supply.
Annexure 2.5 ANNUAL PLAN - 1993-94 - MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME - STATES and UNION TERRITORIES (Rs. lakhs)
| SL. NO. | STATE/UT | OUTLAYS UNDER MINIMUM NEEDS PROGRAMME | %age of col.16 to col.3 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OF SLUMS | NUTRITION | TOTAL | |||
| 1. | 2. | 14. | 15. | 16. | 17. |
| UNION TERRITORIES | |||||
| 26. | A and N Islands | 0.00 | 34.74 | 1247.31 | 7.97 |
| 27. | Chandigarh | 0.00 | 3.00 | 268.50 | 3.36 |
| 28. | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 0.00 | 43.00 | 292.80 | 13.31 |
| 29. | Daman and Diu | 4.50 | 15.00 | 218.05 | 13.63 |
| 30. | Delhi | 900.00 | 934.00 | 8193.00 | 7.62 |
| 31 . | Lakshadweep | 0.00 | 8.00 | 168.65 | 5.27 |
| 32. | Pondi cherry | 40.00 | 220.00 | 1079.00 | 9.99 |
| Total (UTs.) : | 944.50 | 1257.74 | 11467.31 | 7.. 70 | |
| Grand total (States and UTs) | : 7257.50 | 35136.74 | 395022.31 | 11.20 | |
S) : Included under
Elementary Education.
* ; Included
under Rural Water Supply.
PLAN OUTLAY BY BROAD HEADS OF DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL PLAN 1993 - 94
AGRICULTURAL
SERVICES INCLUDE'-
Agriculturalt Allied Service,
Rural Development.
Special Area Progranmc,
Irrigation and Food.
OTHERS DEV. PROGRAMMES:-
Communication,
Science.Technology and Environment
Ceneral Econoric Service and
General Services.
PLAN OUTLAY BY BROAD HEADS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR EIGHTH PLAN 1992 - 97
Rs.Crores
AGRI.
and ENERGY INDUSTRY TRANSPORT SOCIAL AREA DEV. SERVICE @ and MINERALS
SERVICES PROGRAMME
and OTHERS
@ AGRICULTURAL
SERVICES INCLUDE: * OTHERS INCLUDE :
Agricultural
and Allied Services, Communications. Science Technology and Environment,
Rural Development General Economic Services and , General
Services. Irrigation and Flood Control
